Processing math: 100%

CSS

Thursday, December 2, 2021

Subgroups: Normal and...Abnormal...

1. Definition. Let {G} be a group; denote its group structure as the tuple {(G,e_{G},\star_{G},\iota_{G})} where {\iota_{G}} is the inverse operator, {e_{G}} is the identity element, {\star_{G}} is the binary composition operator.

We define a Subgroup of {G} to consist of a subset {H\subseteq G} equipped with {G}'s group structure, i.e.,

  1. the binary operation restricted to {H}, {\star|_{H}\colon H\times H\to G}
  2. the inverse operator {\iota|_{H}\colon H\to H}
  3. the identity element from {G}, {e_{G}\in H}
such that
  1. the group composition is closed on {H}, i.e., {\{h_{1}\star|_{H}h_{2}|h_{1},h_{2}\in H\}\subseteq H}
  2. group inversion is closed in {H}, i.e., {\iota|_{H}(H)\subseteq H}
  3. the usual group properties holds for this group structure induced on {H}.
If further {H\neq G}, we call {H} a Proper Subgroup of {G}.

1.1. Remark. We denote {H<G} if {H} is a proper subgroup of {G}, and {H\leq G} if {H} is a generic subgroup of {G}.

2. Example (Trivial subgroups). For any group {G}, there are always two subgroups available: {G} itself, and the trivial subgroup {\mathbf{1}} consisting of only the identity element. Since these subgroups come "for free", we call them Trivial Subgroups.

3. Example (Subgroups of dihedral group). Let {n\in\mathbb{N}} be greater than 2. Recall the dihedral group {D_{n}} consists of rotations by {2\pi/n} radians and reflections. We have two subgroups (at least): one generated by rotations alone, the other generated by reflections alone.

The subgroup of rotations is a finite group consisting of {n} elements. It's a cyclic group, isomorphic to {\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}}.

The subgroup of reflections is less exciting. There are two elements in it: reflection about the {x}-axis, and the identity transformation. This is a cyclic subgroup of order 2, isomorphic to {\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}}.

4. Example (NON-Example: subset alone insufficient). Consider modular arithmetic {\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}} for some prime {p}. This is a group consisting of a set {\{0,1,\dots,p-1\}} equipped with addition modulo {p}, inversion maps {m} to {-m\equiv p-m\bmod{p}}.

Although the underlying set is a subset of the additive group {\mathbb{Z}}, the addition operation is a different function. Consequently, the group structure on {\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}} is not equal to the group structure on {\mathbb{Z}}. The moral: being a subset alone is insufficient.

5. Example (Symmetric group). Let {n\in\mathbb{N}}. The symmetric group {S_{n}} consists of permutations of the set {\Omega_{n}=\{1,2,\dots,n\}}. We can consider {k\leq n}, and then we have {S_{k}\leq S_{n}} by restricting to permutations of the subset {\Omega_{k}\subseteq\Omega_{n}}.

6. Example. Recall the general linear group {\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{R})} is the group of {n\times n} invertible matrices over the real numbers, using matrix multiplication as its binary operator, and matrix inversion for its group inverse. Also recall the determinant \det\colon\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{R})\to\mathbb{R}^{\times} \tag{1} is a group morphism. Its kernel is a subgroup, called the Special Linear Group, denoted \mathrm{SL}(n,\mathbb{R})=\{M\in\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{R})|\det(M)=1\}. \tag{2} The reader can check it is closed under matrix multiplication and matrix inversion.

7. Example. Let {G} be any group. If {g_{1},g_{2}\in G}, then their commutator is the element {[g_{1},g_{2}]=g_{1}g_{2}g_{1}^{-1}g_{2}^{-1}\in G}. We can construct the Commutator Subgroup of {G}, denoted {[G,G]} or (more commonly but more confusingly) by {G'} in the literature, by considering the subgroup generated by commutators of elements of {G}. Then an arbitrary element of the commutator subgroup looks like {} [g_{1},g_{2}][g_{3},g_{4}](\dots)[g_{2n-1},g_{2n}]\in[G,G] \tag{3} and we use multiplication from {G}.

1. Exercises

Exercise 1. Let {H_{1}}, {H_{2}\leq G}. Is {H_{1}\cap H_{2}} a subgroup of {G}?

Exercise 2. Let {H_{1}}, {H_{2}\leq G}. Is {H_{1}\cup H_{2}} a subgroup of {G}?

Exercise 3. Let {\varphi\colon G\to K} be a group morphism. Is the image of {\varphi} a subgroup of {K}?

If {H<K}, is its preimage under {\varphi} a subgroup of {G}?

Exercise 4. Prove or find a counter-example: if {G} is a cyclic group, then every subgroup is cyclic.

2. Normal Subgroups

8. The special linear group is a rather special situation (no pun intended). We can prove that, for any {M\in\mathrm{SL}(n,\mathbb{R})} and for any {T\in\mathrm{GL}(n,\mathbb{R})}, we have {XMX^{-1}\in\mathrm{SL}(n,\mathbb{R})}. Really? Look, take its determinant: \begin{split} \det(XMX^{-1})&=\det(X)\det(M)\det(X)^{-1}\\ &=\det(M)=1. \end{split} \tag{4} Its a property shared by the kernel of any group morphism {\varphi\colon G\to H}, we'd have {k\in\ker(\varphi)} and {g\in G} satisfy {\varphi(gkg^{-1})=\varphi(g)\varphi(k)\varphi(g)^{-1}=\varphi(k)=e_{H}}. This gives us a particular kind of subgroups.

9. Definition. Let {G} be a group. A Normal Subgroup of {G} consists of a subgroup {H\leq G} such that

  1. Closed under conjugation by group elements: for any {h\in H} and for any {g\in G}, we have {ghg^{-1}\in H}.

9.1. Remark. Care must be taken for the normality property: all we ask is for {ghg^{-1}\in H}, not that {ghg^{-1}=h}.

9.2. Remark (Notation). We denote a normal subgroup {N} of {G} by {N \triangleleft G}, and {N \trianglelefteq G} if {N} is a proper normal subgroup of {G}. There are a couple ways of remembering which way the triangle points: one is that we just turn the subgroup notation {N\leq G} into a triangle, the other is that it "snitches" on (i.e., points to) the normal subgroup.

10. Example. The trivial subgroups are trivially normal.

11. Example. For the Dihedral group {D_{n}}, we have a couple subgroups (one generated by rotations, the other generated by reflections). Is one of them normal?

The rotation subgroup is generated by {r} and satisfies {r^{n}=1}. The reflection subgroup is generated by {s} and satisfies {s^{2}=1}. Together, they have {s\circ r^{k}\circ s=r^{-k}}. This implies the rotation subgroup is normal.

Is the reflection subgroup normal?

12. Theorem. Let {G} be a group. If {G} is Abelian, then every subgroup {H\leq G} is normal.

Proof: Assume {G} is Abelian. Let {H\leq G} be an arbitrary subgroup of {G}, let {g\in G} and {h\in H} be arbitrary group elements. Then conjugation looks like {g+h-g=h}. Hence {H} is a normal subgroup of {G} by Definition 9. ∎

13. Example (Converse to Theorem 12 is false). Consider the quaternion group {Q_{8}} generated by {i^{4}=j^{4}=k^{4}=(ijk)^{2}=1} and so {ij=k}, {jk=i}, {j=ki}. We really have only 8 elements in {Q_{8}}: {1}, {-1}, {i}, {-i}, {j}, {-j}, {k}, {-k}. But we only need two of the "purely imaginary" elements ({i}, {j}, {k}) to generate the entire group.

The proper subgroups would be generated from one complex generator, or from {-1}. We claim they are all normal. The case of {\{\pm1\}<Q_{8}} is obviously normal, since {x(-1)x^{-1}=-1} for any {x\in Q_{8}}.

The reasoning for proper subgroups generated by one imaginary element resembles one another, so let's consider the subgroup generated by {i}. Then we see jij^{-1}=-jk=-i \tag{5} and j^{3}ij^{-3}=(-j)i(j)=i. \tag{6} Similarly we'd find, from {i^{3}=-i}, that ji^{3}j^{-1}=i \tag{7} and j^{3}i^{3}j^{-3}=-i. \tag{8} Thus the subgroup generated by {i} is closed under conjugation from all elements from {Q_{8}}.

Really? Well, any generic element in {Q_{8}} looks like {i^{m}j^{n}}. Its inverse would be {(i^{m}j^{n})^{-1}=j^{-n}i^{-m}}. So conjugation by these elements would amount to multiplying the element {i^{\ell}} from the subgroup by some {i^{q}}. But that's okay: elements of the form {i^{q}} belong to the subgroup anyways.

14. Theorem. If {\varphi\colon G\to H} is a group morphism, then {\ker(\varphi)} is a normal subgroup of {G}.

The proof was sketched earlier in §8.

15. Theorem. Let {G} be a group. Every normal subgroup {N\triangleleft G} is the kernel of some group morphism.

15.1. Remark. We do not yet have the technology to prove this, yet, but it is true. Basically, we construct a morphism by taking {g\in G} and mapping it to cosets {gN=\{gn\in G|n\in N\}}. The difficulty we have is that the image of this mapping is the collection of left cosets of {N}, which may or may not be a group. Further, it was rather arbitrary mapping it to left cosets of {N}: why not map {g} to {Ng=\{ng\in G|n\in N\}}? Wouldn't these be distinct (i.e., not equal) mappings?

3. Exercises

Exercise 5. Find the normal subgroups of the symmetric group {S_{n}}.

Exercise 6. Let {G} be a group, {H\triangleleft G} be a normal subgroup, and {N\triangleleft H} be a normal subgroup of {H}. Is {N} a normal subgroup of {G}?

Exercise 7. Let {G} be a group, recall the commutator subgroup from Example 7 that {[G,G]} is a subgroup of {G}. Prove or find a counter-example: the commutator subgroup is a normal subgroup of {G}.

Exercise 8. Let {\varphi\colon G\to H} be a group morphism, {N\triangleleft G} be a normal subgroup. Is {\varphi(N)} a normal subgroup of {G}? Consider the cases when {\varphi} is injective, and when {\varphi} is surjective.

Exercise 9. Let {\varphi\colon G\to H} be a group morphism, and {N_{H}\triangleleft G} be a normal subgroup. Is the preimage {\varphi^{-1}(N_{H}) = \{g\in G|\varphi(g)\in N_{H}\}} a normal subgroup of {G}? Is it even a subgroup?

No comments:

Post a Comment